large Reddit logo overlaying background of smaller logo silhouettes
Image Credits:TechCrunch
AI

OpenAI inks deal to train AI on Reddit data

OpenAI has reached a deal with Reddit to use the social news siteโ€™s data for training AI models.

In a blog post on OpenAIโ€™s press relations site, the company said that the Reddit partnership will provide it access to โ€œreal-time, structured and unique contentโ€ โ€” e.g. posts and replies โ€” from Reddit, allowing its tools and models to โ€œbetter understand and showcaseโ€ that content. Reddit content will be incorporated into ChatGPT, OpenAIโ€™s popular conversational AI, and the companies will work together to bring unspecified new โ€œAI-powered featuresโ€ to both Reddit users and moderators.

OpenAI will also become a Reddit advertising partner.

โ€œReddit will be building on OpenAIโ€™s platform of AI models to bring its powerful vision to life,โ€ OpenAI wrote in the post. โ€œUsing LLMs, ML, and AI allow Reddit to improve the user experience for everyone.โ€

OpenAI has several similar licensing deals with content providers ranging from stock media libraries to news publishers. But the unusual angle to this one is that Sam Altman, OpenAIโ€™s CEO, has an 8.7% stake in Reddit, making him the third-largest shareholder, and was once a member of the companyโ€™s board of directors.

In an attempt to discourage scrutiny, OpenAI says in its press release that, while Altman remains a Reddit shareholder, the partnership โ€œwas led by OpenAIโ€™s COO [Brad Lightcap]โ€ and โ€œapproved by [OpenAIโ€™s] independent board of directors.โ€ (Iโ€™ll note here that Altman is a member of OpenAIโ€™s board; he recused himself for this decision, however, an OpenAI spokesperson tells TechCrunch.)

0 of 33 minutes, 5 secondsVolume 0%
00:02
33:02
33:05
 

Reddit has made data licensing agreements an increasingly central part of its growth strategy as it navigates the market as a public company.

In its IPO prospectus, Reddit revealed that it has contractual agreements to license its data to customers including Google worth a combined over $200 million. And, in its first earnings report as a public company, Reddit reported a 450% year-over-year increase in non-ad revenue, attributable mainly to those agreements.

Reddit stock was up 11% in extended trading following the announcement of the OpenAI deal.

โ€œThe paradox I see is that, as more content on the internet is written by machines, thereโ€™s an increasing premium on content that comes from real people,โ€ Reddit CEO Steve Huffman said during the companyโ€™s earnings call in March. โ€œAnd we have nearly two decades of authentic conversation.โ€

Redditโ€™s platform โ€” which has over 1 billion posts and more than 16 billion comments, figures that grow every day thanks to its hundreds of millions of active users โ€” is a gold mine for generative AI companies, whose models learn from examples of content, like text and images, to generate new, similar content.

But the company could face pushback from users concerned about how itโ€™s monetizing their data.

Itโ€™s instructive to look at Stack Overflow, the Q&A forum for software developers, which recently inked an agreement with OpenAI to supply data for the latterโ€™s model training. In protest, some users deleted their top-rated answers to questions on the community. But Stack Overflow restored the deleted posts and banned those users, claiming that they werenโ€™t in compliance with its terms of service.

Reddit has already voiced its displeasure with one attempt to afford Reddit users greater control over their own data.

Vana, a startup built on the blockchain, is attempting to launch a data โ€œDAOโ€ (Digital Autonomous Organization) to let Reddit users pool their data and let them decide together how that combined dataโ€™s used (or sold). Reddit banned Vanaโ€™s subreddit dedicated to discussion about the DAO, in a statement to TechCrunch, and accused the company of โ€œexploitingโ€ its data export controls.

Weโ€™re launching an AI newsletter! Sign up here to start receiving it in your inboxes on June 5.

Topics

, , , , ,
Keep reading
Image Credits:Meta
Social

Meta quietly launches a new Reddit-like app called Forum

Meta has quietly released a new stand-alone app for Facebook Groups called โ€œForum.โ€ The company seems to be positioning Forum as a platform that functions similarly to Reddit, describing the app as a โ€œdedicated space built for deeper discussions, real answers and communities you care about.โ€

The app appears to have first been spotted by social media consultant Matt Navarra.

After you sign in with your Facebook account, Forum will load in your groups, profile, and activity, and let you make posts with a nickname, just like on the standard Facebook app. Meta noted that your groups still exist on Facebook, and anything you share on Forum will be visible in your groups on Facebook.

Meta says Forumโ€™s feeds are centered on conversations within groups, allowing users to see โ€œwhat real people are saying, not just whatโ€™s trending,โ€ and making it easy to pick up where they left off.

The app includes an AI-powered โ€œAskโ€ tab that lets users ask questions and receive answers compiled from discussions across different groups. Thereโ€™s also an admin AI assistant to help administrators manage groups and moderate content.

This isnโ€™t the first time Meta has launched a stand-alone app for groups. Back in 2014, the company rolled out a dedicated Groups app that aimed to make it easier for users to share content across groups, but that effort was shuttered in 2017.

Forum is one of two new apps from Meta in recent weeks. Last month, the social media company rolled out a new app called Instants that lets users share disappearing photos with Instagram friends.

SpaceX files to go public, and the math requires a little faith | Equity Podcast
0 seconds of 33 minutes, 5 secondsVolume 0%
 

Instants and Forum come amid a broader effort at Meta to release more apps. The Wall Street Journal reported a few weeks ago that CEO Mark Zuckerberg told employees that with AI-driven efficiencies allowing the company to build more apps, the social media giant now aims to roll out many more apps than it has historically.

Referring to Metaโ€™s chief product office Chris Cox, Zuckerberg reportedly said, โ€œSo Chris and I have been talking about โ€˜all right, well can we build 50 new apps?โ€™ Like, yeah probably. But we probably should start by doing a few before we just, like, ramp up trying to do 50 all at once.โ€ 

Meta might think consumers want more apps, but thatโ€™s likely not the case, especially when its new apps mostly end up being copies of other popular services. Instants, for example, borrows ideas from BeReal and Snapchat, while Meta Edits, launched last year, is largely a copy of ByteDanceโ€™s CapCut.

Meta did not immediately return a request for comment.

Topics

, , , , , ,
Keep reading
Image Credits:Francesco Carta fotografo / Getty Images
AI

Six search engines worth trying now that Google isnโ€™t really Google anymore

Google is about to look really different, and if youโ€™re not a fan of the AI Overviews feature, then youโ€™re not going to like whatโ€™s coming.

At the Google I/O 2026 keynote this week, the company announced that it is overhauling Search to embrace a conversational, AI-driven approach, even inviting users to enlist AI agents to automatically notify them if, for example, their favorite band were to go on tour.

โ€œThis is the biggest upgrade to our iconic search box since its debut over 25 years ago,โ€ said Elizabeth Reid, leader of the Search organization at Google.

Now, when you search on Google, youโ€™re given the option from the start to use AI mode. Even if you opt not to use AI mode, you might get a search result with an AI Overview, which will now include a chat box for you to ask follow-up questions. Once you open the chat box, Google begins to look more like ChatGPT than the search engine thatโ€™s ingrained itself into our lives for decades.

This announcement didnโ€™t elicit the reaction that Google wouldโ€™ve hoped for. Instead, many users see this as yet another example of a tech company squeezing AI agents and chatbots into everything it can, making it impossible to navigate the internet without encountering a chatbot. Especially after the rocky rollout of Googleโ€™s AI Overviews โ€” remember when Google told people to stare into the sun? โ€” users are not eager for another adjustment.

Image Credits:Google

On Googleโ€™s video announcing the Search updates, one commenter wrote, โ€œthis is the best advertisement for letting people know itโ€™s time to get a different search engine.โ€

They make a good point. The new Google Search, which Reid describes as โ€œAI search through and through,โ€ is sure to alienate users. Generative AI aside, some users have also grown weary of Google for its sheer dominance โ€” a U.S. District Court ruled in 2024 that Google had acted illegally to maintain a monopoly in online search.

SpaceX files to go public, and the math requires a little faith | Equity Podcast
0 seconds of 33 minutes, 5 secondsVolume 0%
 

If youโ€™re curious about alternative search engines, youโ€™re in the right place. Here are some places to start (or, embrace chaos and see where Open Web Engine takes you).

Kagi

Before we were annoyed by Googleโ€™s AI Overview, we were annoyed by ads. Ads are non-negotiable for Google โ€” thatโ€™s how Google Search makes money. But if a search engine were to operate without ads, could it still make money?

Thatโ€™s what Kagi is trying to accomplish. For $5 per month โ€” or $10 for unlimited searches โ€” you can access an ad-free search engine without AI overviews.

Kagi isnโ€™t just ad-free Google. The search engine also lets users customize their search experience by letting them filter certain websites and refine search results with โ€œlenses.โ€ If youโ€™re in school, for example, you can use Kagiโ€™s academic lens to find journal articles about a topic, rather than blog posts.

If you find Googleโ€™s AI Overviews useful from time to time, then you can use Kagiโ€™s AI-powered โ€œQuick Answerโ€ feature to summarize an answer to your search and include links to its sources. But if you donโ€™t want these AI summaries, guess what? You donโ€™t have to generate them.

DuckDuckGo

Maybe you donโ€™t want to pay to search stuff online. Thatโ€™s understandable. DuckDuckGo offers a free search engine that makes money by selling ads, but unlike Google, it doesnโ€™t collect user data in the form of search, browsing, and purchase history. Instead DuckDuckGo chooses what ads to serve based on the topic of your search โ€” so if you search for concert tickets, you might see an ad for SeatGeek.

Like many alternative search engines, DuckDuckGo has an interface thatโ€™s reminiscent of Google โ€” and like Google, it can display an AI-generated answer to a question in your search results. But if that bothers you, DuckDuckGo allows you to completely opt out of AI features in the settings menu.

Startpage

While DuckDuckGo has its own separate search index from Google, Startpage is a proxy for Google.

This means that Startpage acts as a middleman between you and the tech giant. When you search for something on Startpage, the company strips personal data like your IP address from your query, sends it to Google via the cloud, and returns the information to you. So, itโ€™s Google without Google knowing who you are. The downside is, well, itโ€™s still Google. At least Startpage lets you turn off AI features.

&udm=14

What if you took Startpage and made it simpler? The search engine &udm=14 is named for the string of characters it appends to all of your searches on Google.

If you add &udm=14 to your Google searches, youโ€™ll get the same Google results, only without an AI overview. But doing that yourself after every search is pretty annoying. Thatโ€™s why &udm=14 does it for you automatically.

The developer even put the code on GitHub so you can run your own version of &udm=14 if thatโ€™s your thing.

If youโ€™re concerned about privacy, then youโ€™d probably opt for Startpage over &udm=14, but both will basically get you AI-free Google.

Brave

Brave offers both a browser and a search engine. Since the browser is built atop Chromium, which is the same open-source base as Google Chrome, you can use Chrome extensions within the Brave browser. So, if you donโ€™t want to use Google Chrome, but you canโ€™t function without your LastPass plug-in, Brave could be for you.

In terms of search, Brave allows users to apply certain third-party โ€œGogglesโ€ (not Googles!) to their searches, which curate the results. These include โ€œNews from the Right,โ€ โ€œNews from the Left,โ€ โ€œTech Blogs,โ€ and some other more niche options, like โ€œHacker News/1k short,โ€ which prioritizes common domains referenced on Y-Combinatorโ€™s Hacker News forum, but without the 1,000 most popular domains, so it omits more mainstream sites. Then, thereโ€™s โ€œNo Pinterest,โ€ which is pretty self-explanatory (and funny).

And yes, Brave does let you toggle AI features on and off. Thereโ€™s no reason you canโ€™t do this, Google.

Ecosia

Like Brave, Ecosia also offers both a browser and a search engine, and itโ€™s also built atop Chromium, meaning that your Chrome plug-ins should work on Ecosia too. As its name suggests, Ecosiaโ€™s main draw is that itโ€™s supposed to be more eco-friendly than other search platforms.

Ecosia makes money from ads, but it donates about 80% of its income to tree-planting initiatives around the world. Tree-planting can sometimes be a red flag for greenwashing, but Ecosia works with communities involved in local reforestation efforts, publishes monthly financial reports for transparency, and blogs about the actual impact of its efforts.

Topics

, ,
Loading the next article
Some areas of this page may shift around if you resize the browser window. Be sure to check heading and document order.